Session Descriptions

Session descriptions will be added as they are confirmed. Please check this page regularly for updated information. 

Click on the links below to be directed to specific days:

Wednesday, April 26

Welcome Remarks

15:30-16:00

Harbans Dhillon, ISOPP President, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Miklós Kásler, General Director, National
Institute of Oncology; President, Medical Oncology Board, Budapest, Hungary

 

Opening Plenary
Bridging the Gaps in Cancer Management

16:00-17:00

Andreas Ullrich, Adviser to the Assistant Director General, Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Learning Objectives:

  1. Provide an insight in WHO’s cancer control policies with specific focus on essential medicines;
  2. Outline existing gasp in access to cancer medicines;
  3. Present the guiding principles for bridging gasp in access to cancer medicines; and
  4. Catalyse a discussion about what could be ISOPP’s role in supporting the global cancer control policies.

Thursday, April 27

Plenary 
Can We Afford Innovation in Oncology?

08:30-09:30

Paul Cornes, Oncologist, Clinical Outcomes Group, Bristol, United Kingdom

The Global Burden of Disease Study shows deaths from cancer rose from 5·7 million in 1990 to 8·2 million in 2013, making cancer the greatest current threat to life in the world. With one in seven deaths worldwide from cancer this explains why cancer is now so important to the global health agenda.

Cancer describes more than 200 separate diseases – ranging from those we can live with for a lifetime to those than can prove fatal within months. Each cancer type can be further subdivided into many different subgroups: for example we now know that Breast Cancer comprises at least 10 separate diseases - each with its own natural history, prognosis and response to treatment. Yet all this complexity may be explained by loss of regulation of perhaps just a dozen intracellular mechanisms. This suggests that a limited panel of precision targeted therapies might eventually control most cancers. This is the dream of personalized medicine.

However with most innovative cancer medicines now costing over $10,000 a month – how is this to be afforded for the world? Already only 7 of the richest nations use 75% of the world’s biologic therapies – leaving the remaining 193 counties with only 25%.

Oncology pharmacists need now to be able to assess patients for any financial distress and steer them to affordable and effective therapies. They also need to be involved in formulary guidance – for which the skill of interpreting Health Technology Assessments and Health Economic Research will be crucial. They also need to understand that the future for affordable innovation in cancer medicine is not just gloomy and pessimistic - but bright and exciting.

Suggested Reading:

[1] Hanahan D, Weinberg RA.The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000 Jan 7;100(1):57-70.

[2] Sullivan R et al. Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(10):933-80. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70141-3.

[3] Zafar SY. Financial Toxicity of Cancer Care: It's Time to Intervene. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 11;108(5). pii: djv370. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv370. Print 2016 May.

[4] Nadler E, Eckert B, Neumann PJ. Do oncologists believe new cancer drugs offer good value? The Oncologist. 2006;11(2):90-95.

Learning Objectives

  1. To assess the potential of innovation in cancer medicine;
  2. To realize why cancer medicines access is constrained worldwide – and why this may worsen in the future; and
  3. To appreciate the central role of pharmacists in maintaining the momentum of innovation in cancer medicine

 

Concurrent Session 1
Clinical 1: Immune Related Adverse Effect Management

10:30-11:30

Alexandre Chan, Deputy Head and Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore

CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, commonly known as immune checkpoint inhibitors, are used for the treatment of various malignancies. These agents inhibit negative regulators of immune activation, which results in many patients developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including endocrinopathies, pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis and dermatologic events. These adverse events may lead to treatment interruption as well as a reduction of patients’ quality of life. In this concurrent session, we will discuss the spectrum of toxicities that patients experience with immunotherapy; we will also discuss how these toxicities are best managed according to current evidence and practice. 

Learning Objectives

  1. Discuss the spectrum of toxicities that cancer patients may experience with immunotherapy; and

  2. Discuss how immune-related adverse events are best managed according to current evidence and practice.

Fundamentals 1: Technology Updates

10:30-11:30

Apps, Apps, Everywhere… The Medication App #Explosion
Jennifer Jupp, Pharmacy Clinical Practice Leader, Inpatient Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant, Alberta Health Service - Calgary Zone, Calgary, Canada

With the many medication apps available to patients, how do we choose?  This session will examine whether there are methods available to assess the quality of medication apps and how a quality scale can be used to choose an app for medication management.  We will also discuss how patients can be incorporated into app development and whether an app created by patients can engage more patients.

Learning Objectives

  1. Describe the challenges faced by patients and clinicians when choosing a medication management app;
  2. Discuss the use of a mobile app rating scale to inform patients and clinicians about medication app quality; and
  3. Summarize the opportunities for patients to participate in medication app development

Patient Web-Based Registries to Monitor New Medicine Using and Value-For-Money: The Hospital Pharmacist's Perspective
Felice Musicco, Pharmacist, Instituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri, Rome, Italy

Patient registries are particularly common in Italy, followed by the Czech Republic, Belgium, Sweden and Australia. Registries are employed to target the price, use and effectiveness, and ultimately budget impact and cost-effectiveness of new medicine. The rationale for introducing registries and management entry agreements include improving access, addressing uncertainty, personalizing treatment, and in some cases improving cost effectiveness or reducing prices. As a main result of this approach to appropriateness in prescribing, it gets easier to use new drugs with a better level of confidence, to obtain early drug activity indicators and to better manage the expenditure controls. In Italy, AIFA’s (Italian Medicines Agency) web-based Monitoring Registries track the eligibility of patients and the complete flow of treatments. Hospital consultants are required to complete online prescription forms, with the patient’s identification data, therapeutic indication and dosages. In addition to the prescription, the registry requires the treating physician to record follow-up clinical data and outcomes. The system validates each prescription and administration.

However, in general, particularly in the chemotherapy setting, hospitals have local databases and software including electronic patient medical records and electronic prescribing, scheduling and managing. These systems focus on reducing errors, streamlining patient management and optimizing efficiency

External web-based technologies have an impact on local administrative burdens and should communicate and interconnect with local software to remove extra efforts and reduce errors. The NHS hospital consultants’ and pharmacists’ time for completing the forms represents a cost. In this session, we will discuss the specifications, tools and options these web-based technologies should provide to optimize the local software and support the clinical oncology pharmacist.

 Learning Objectives

  1. Describe how different NHS, and particularly Italy, have implemented patient registries to monitor treatments and drug value-for-money;
  2. Discuss how AIFA web-based Monitoring Registries track the eligibility of patients and the complete flow of treatments;
  3. Identify opportunities to communicate and interconnect between web-based registries and local software to remove extra efforts and reduce errors; and
  4. Identify tools and options these web-based technologies could provide to optimize clinical oncology pharmacy.

Research 1: Workplace Contamination Update

10:30-11:30

Rudolf SchierlHead of the Analytical and Monitoring Department, Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany

In this session, there are three topics about antineoplastic drugs (ADs) which will be discussed:

  1. New results regarding benefits of long-term monitoring of surface contamination by ADs in pharmacies. In a recent publication (Böhlandt and Schierl 2016), it turned out that after the introduction of a traffic light system with challenging guidance values, the contamination levels significantly dropped during the succeeding years.
  2. Data from administration areas (Kopp et al 2013; Janes et al 2015) showed clearly that patient excretions (urine, sweat) are the main source of contamination by ADs in day-care units. Therefore, a strict cleaning protocol is important to avoid unintended drug uptake.
  3. Hospital pharmacists play an important role in advising hospital staff on good working practices concerning ADs. An actual paper (Schenk et al 2016) shows that HIPEC patients excreted high concentrations of platinum drugs during the following 3 days in urine and drainage fluids. However, in many cases, the healthcare staff on intensive care units are not aware of this problem.

Learning Objectives

  1. Wipe samples are a powerful tool in detecting surface contamination by ADs;
  2. Reporting of contamination by motivating guidance values reduces surface contamination;
  3. Patients excretions (namely urine and sweat) are a main source of contamination in day-care units; and
  4. HIPEC–patients excrete high platinum-drug concentrations in urine and drainage fluids during several days after OP.

ISOPP Annual General Meeting

11:30-12:30

All ISOPP members are encouraged to attend the Annual General Meeting.  Be part of the community advancing oncology pharmacy patient care.

Back to top

Concurrent Session 2
Clinical 2: Solid Tumour Updates

14:00-15:30

Cancer of Unknown Primary
Peter Gilbar, Pharmacist Consultant, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia

Cancer of unknown primary site (CUPs) represents a hetergeneous group of metastatic tumours for which a standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the site of origin at the time of diagnosis. CUPs account for 3% to 5% of all malignancies. Data suggests that metastatic dissemination can occur in the absence of growth of a primary tumour by virtue of inherent metastatic aggressiveness of cancer cells.

CUPs are a clinical challenge for clinicians. Diagnostic work-up of patients includes detailed immuno-histopathological examinations from adequate tissue sampling combined with extensive radiological imaging to find as much information as possible to guide treatment decisions. CUPs can be divided into favourable (15%) and unfavourable (85%) subsets. Favourable subsets include adenocarcinoma in axillary lymph nodes, peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma involving cervical lymph nodes, and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Patients with unfavourable CUP subsets have a poor prognosis with median survival of approximately 8 months and optimal chemotherapy for these patients remains to be determined. Although studies have generally focused on combination therapy with broad spectrum activity (platinum agents, taxanes, gemcitabine and irinotecan), randomized trials have failed to provide clear evidence of survival benefit. Low toxicity, patient convenient chemotherapy regimens are suggested in patients with reasonable performance status, with quality-of-life issues paramount.

Favourable subsets are mostly given locoregional treatment or systemic chemotherapy aimed at the most likely diagnosis. Therapy should be individually tailored according to the clinic-pathological subset in which the patient belongs. Responses and survival are thought to be similar to those of patients with relevant known primary tumours. With an increasing number of molecular targeted therapies available, molecular profiling assays may prove valuable in the identification of additional therapeutic options in this difficult-to-treat malignancy.

Learning Objectives

  1. Understand the process of using different diagnostic tests to narrow the range of possible primary sites in cancer of unknown primary;
  2. Identify which patients fall into favourable and unfavourable subsets in terms of prognosis;
  3. Understand what antineoplastic agents and chemotherapeutic protocols may be used in the management of cancer of unknown primary in both favourable and unfavourable subsets of patients; and
  4. Explore the potential use of molecular profiling assays and targeted therapies in the diagnosis and management of these tumours.

GYN Malignancies
Evelyn Handel, Oncology Scientist, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Willow Grove, USA

Slow progress in improving the outcomes of gynecologic malignancies with traditional chemotherapy over the last decade has stimulated research into the potential roles of immunotherapy and molecularly targeted therapy. This presentation will review the impact of recently published data for Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors and hormonal therapies in GYN cancers. In addition, an update on the use of dose-dense versus conventional paclitaxel and a review of other emerging treatment strategies such as trabectedin for gynecologic malignancies will be provided.

Learning Objectives

  1. Summarize the new developments in targeted, immune-directed and hormonal therapies for the treatment of advanced gynecologic malignancies;
  2. Review recent data for traditional chemotherapy agents including trabectedin and dose-dense versus conventional paclitaxel for the treatment of GYN cancers; and
  3. Assess emerging treatment strategies for gynecologic malignancies and their potential impact on patient outcomes.

Temozolomide for Glioma: Review of the Clinical Evidence
Gábor Takács, Chief Pharmacist, National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Budapest, Hungary

The effectiveness, safety and tolerability of temozolomide, a novel oral chemotherapy drug, will be discussed in the treatment of high grade glioma. High grade glioma is a rapidly progressive form of brain cancer with a poor survival rate. The aim is to assess whether temozolomide has any advantage for treating high grade glioma in either primary or recurrent disease settings. Randomised controlled trials where the interventions were the use of temozolomide were systematically searched and analyzed with the methodology of evidence-based medicine.

According to the recent evidence, temozolomide given in both concomitant and adjuvant phases is an effective primary therapy in glioblastoma multiforme compared to radiotherapy alone. It prolongs survival and delays progression without impacting on quality of life. It increases early adverse events. In recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, temozolomide improves time to progression and may have benefits on quality of life without increasing adverse events but it does not improve overall survival. These trials enrolled highly selected patients with good prognostic features that are not entirely representative of all patients with high grade glioma limiting the general applicability of the results.

Learning Objectives

  1. Briefly review the epidemiology, pathophysiology and molecular biology of high grade glioma;
  2. Describe the clinical evidence and trial data for temozolomide in the treatment of high grade glioma; and
  3. Discuss the limitations of the interpretation of clinical trial data in the evaluation of the effectiveness of temozolomide.

Fundamentals 2: Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies

14:00-15:30

Occupational Exposure Risks Associated with Monoclonal Antibodies
Marliese Alexander, Pharmacist, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

While operator exposure risks with traditional cytotoxics are well established, extension of the same practices for monoclonal antibodies may not be appropriate. This presentation will discuss the determinants of occupational exposure risks to hazardous drugs, the status of monoclonal antibodies within current hazardous chemical registers, and in comparison with other hazardous and non-hazardous drugs. Evidence for the internalisation of monoclonal antibodies will be presented in relation to exposure potential during manufacturing, administration and waste disposal. A brief overview of available safeguards will be provided, and operational and clinical factors which may, more so than safety considerations, influence handling practices will be discussed.

Learning Objectives

  1. Determinants of occupational exposure risks to hazardous drugs – internalisation and toxicity;
  2. Status of monoclonal antibodies within current hazardous chemical registers;
  3. Comparison of monoclonal antibodies with other hazardous and non-hazardous drugs;
  4. Physiochemical properties of monoclonal antibodies;
  5. Internalisation potential of monoclonal antibodies;
  6. Toxicity profile of monoclonal antibodies;
  7. Occupational exposure potential during manufacturing, administration waste disposal;
  8. Available interventions and safeguards; and
  9. Operational and clinical factors which may outweigh safety considerations.

Development of an Algorithm for Risk Assessment and Allocation of Preparation of Monoclonal Antibodies
Tiene Bauters, Clinical Pharmacist, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

In order to provide a clear answer on the question of whether monoclonal antibodies (MABs) should be prepared in the central pharmacy or on the ward, a practical algorithm has been developed.

It provides recommendations for the classification of MABs according to their toxicity profile and takes practical and financial issues into account.

Learning Objectives

  1. Overview of different types of MABs;
  2. Understanding of toxicity, immunogenicity and internal exposure risk from an occupational health and safety perspective; and
  3. Outline a flowchart for safe handling of MABs.

Research 2: Integration of Research into Daily Practice

14:00-15:30

Alain Astier, Head of the Department of Pharmacy, Henri Mondor University Hospital Group, Paris, France

During this session, Alain will explain research on in-use stability of anticancer drugs can improve the daily practice in the pharmacy-based centralized cytotoxic compounding units. A special focus will be given on the extended stability of expensive monoclonal antibodies which can save money, workload and optimize the patient care. Several examples will be discussed such as the extended stability of rituximab, trastuzumab, infliximab and ipilimumab.

How to Integrate Supportive Care and Pharmacy Practice Research into Daily Life
Lisa Holle, Associate Clinical Professor, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA

This session will discuss the how-tos of integrating research related to supportive care (e.g. antiemetics, pain management and infection prevention/treatment) and pharmacy practice, such as documenting the value of oncology pharmacy, cost savings or healthcare professional time savings, decreasing hospitalizations, reducing/preventing medication errors, and improving medication safety and patient satisfaction.

Learning Objectives

  1. Identify opportunities for the description and evaluation of pharmacy practice and/or services and supportive care research;
  2. Describe methods for successful integration of research on supportive care and pharmacy practice into daily oncology pharmacy work; and
  3. List successful examples of research that occurred as part of daily oncology pharmacy practice.

Back to top

Concurrent Session 3
Clinical 3: Pediatric / Adolescent / Young Adult Case Discussions 

16:15-17:45

Tiene Bauters, Clinical Pharmacist, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
Jennifer Jupp, Pharmacy Clinical Practice Leader, Inpatient Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant, Alberta Health Service - Calgary Zone, Calgary, Canada

Rosalyn Sims, Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Michigan, USA
John Wiernikowski,
Clinical Pharmacist, Paediatric Haematology/Oncology
McMaster Children’s Hospital, Hamilton, Canada

This interactive session will have four speakers. Each will present a case from their practice that was particularly challenging or very interesting that involved this unique patient group.

    Learning Objectives

    1. Recognize unusual circumstances or complications in pediatric, adolescent or young adults cancer patients; and
    2. Describe ways to manage these types of cases should they ever encounter similar circumstances in their daily practice.

    Fundamentals 3: Biosimilars - Panel

    16:15-17:45

    Barbara Claus, Pharmacist, Ghent, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
    Paul Cornes, Oncologist, Clinical Outcomes Group, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Sandor Kerpel-Fronius, Professor of Clinical Pharmacology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

    Moderator: László Székely, Symposium Annual Program Task Force Co-Chair, Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary

    Over the past decade's biologics, a new class of drugs has revolutionized the way to treat several diseases. These medicinal products are expensive, making the current rate of expenditure for healthcare not sustainable. Over the past few years, the first patents have begun to expire, giving way to “generic drugs” called biosimilars. The copying of branded biologicals is on average 30% to 40% lower in price compared to the originator, increasing access to these types of therapies in the healthcare industry.

    Learning Objectives

    1. Discuss the difference between biosimilar and generic medicinal products;
    2. Understand the meaning of biosimilarity and interchangeability;
    3. Understand the meaning of immunogenicity;
    4. Understand the meaning of extrapolation;
    5. Discuss the experience with marketed biosimilars; and
    6. Explore the benefits to patients and to the healthcare system.

    Research 3: Investigational Agent Update

    16:15-17:45

    New and Evolving Drugs in Cancer Care:  Investigational Agents in Oncology
    Rowena Schwartz, Associate Professor of Pharmacy Practice, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA

    Drug development for cancer continues to provide new drugs and strategies for the management of individuals with cancer. During this presentation, we will discuss some of the drugs currently in clinical trials around the world, and how the application of these agents may change our approach to care in select solid tumors. The discussion will focus on targets for new drug therapies and the care issues of the agents in clinical practice.
    Learning Objectives

    1. Describe the pharmacology of the cancer agents discussed during the session;
    2. Discuss potential applications of the noted cancer agents, and describe the impact these agents may have on the current standard of care; and
    3. Outline patient and caregiver counselling for agents discussed during the session.

      Hematologic Malignancies and the Role of the Study Pharmacist
      Ida Homoki, Budapest, Hungary

      Hematologic malignancies manipulate the immune suppressive pathways involving CTLA-4, PD-1 and others to promote immune tolerance of cancer. New monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints are showing meaningful responses in the treatment of relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The utilization of immune checkpoint targeting agents to boost the innate and acquired immune systems to eradicate human malignancies represents a unique opportunity to develop novel therapies with increased clinical efficacy.

      During this session, the role and responsibilities of the study pharmacist, the problems to be solved, the local practices at the Hungarian National Institute of Oncology and major trials of hematologic cancer drugs will be covered.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Identify the main roles and tasks of the study pharmacist;
      2. Outline immune checkpoints as targets of new drugs;
      3. Differentiate between single drugs regimens and combinations; and
      4. Find out about clinical trials in the field of hematologic malignancies.

      Back to top

      Friday, April 28

      Plenary
      Ethical and Legal Aspects of Physician Assisted Dying and the Pharmacist's Role

      08:45-09:30

      Ulrich Schuler, Director, Center for Palliative Care, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany

      Physician Assisted Dying (PAD) is a matter of political debate across the globe. While proponents of patient autonomy claim the right to choose the time of ending one's life with the help of others, the opposing groups emphasize the unconditional value of life as a means in itself. Even if one does not share religious or spiritual beliefs upon which these claims may be founded, one has to admit that the legalization of Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) or Euthanasia at the patient's request might put vulnerable populations under a certain pressure. In industrialized countries, public opinion usually supports PAS with a substantial majority. It is important to look at the physical and psychosocial reasons why individual patients express a wish to die. Most but not all are reversible and amenable to interventions by palliative care. Concrete roles of pharmacists depend largely on the respective legislations and the person’s individual moral values. The choice to participate or not in procedures in which a person regards as ethically troubling is usually guaranteed.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Understanding of and respect for the opposing ethical positions concerning Physician Assisted Dying;
      2. Discuss reasons why people express a wish to die; and
      3. Foresee possible role conflicts when working in an environment where PAD is legal.

       

      Round Table Discussions

       

      10:30-11:30

      Participants will have the opportunity to discuss two of the 10 available topics, each led by a different facilitator. Read below for details on the topics and facilitators for this session. Pre-registration was required.  If you did not pre-register and would like to attend, please go to the session room to see if space is available.

      Round Table 1: Implementing Patient Care Programs in Your Practice and Pharmacist Expanded Scope of Practice
      Lisa Holle, Associate Clinical Professor, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA

      This round table is aimed at discussing strategies for implementing patient care programs into your practice and how we can continue to expand the scope of pharmacists throughout the world.

      Round Table 2: Hydration Protocols for Cisplatin
      Rosalyn Sims, Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Michigan, USA

      Cisplatin is used in many treatment protocols for adult and pediatric malignancies. Nephrotoxicity is a dose-limiting adverse effect. Hydration and/or mannitol are commonly used in an attempt to avoid this complication of cisplatin therapy.

      In this round table discussion, we will discuss hydration methods for cisplatin administration. Is there one that is more effective? Come prepared to share how cisplatin is administered at your institution!

      Round Table 3: Prevention of Burnout in Oncology Pharmacists
      Peter Gilbar, Pharmacist Consultant, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia

      Oncology pharmacists are at significant risk of burnout. Discussion topics will include what constitutes burnout, potential causes of burnout and strategies for prevention.

      Round Table 4: New Cardiotoxicities for Oncology Drugs (A.Fib, QT Prolongation, etc.)
      Bruce Burnett, Senior Lecturer in Pharmacy Practice, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom

      As survival improves, the long-term toxicities associated with cancer treatments, including newer targeted and immunotherapies, necessitate strategies in place to maintain quality of life. Cardiotoxicity is associated with a range of cancer-related therapies and identifying at-risk patients, providing effective monitoring and appropriate medical management strategies to prevent cardiotoxicity will be required, as well as managing emergent cardiotoxic effects.

      Round Table 5: Pharmacy Technician Expanded Scope of Practice
      Carole Chambers, Pharmacy Director, Alberta Health and Services Cancer Care, Calgary, Canada

      Pharmacy technicians are seeing expanded scope of practice, whether they are non-regulated or moving to a regulated health profession. Please come ready to discuss some expanded scopes of practice you are seeing in your practice so that we all may find one or two things we can take back to our practices. 

      Round Table 6: Strategies to Integrate Pharmacy Students to Enhance Patient Care and Mobilize Projects
      Tara Leslie, Clinical Pharmacist, Alberta Health Services / University of Alberta, Calgary, Canada

      Precepting pharmacy students or residents in your oncology practice has many benefits.  Not only does oncology practice provide a rich learning opportunity for learners, but precepting can allow for enhancement of patient care services, additional manpower to mobilize projects, and recruitment of new staff.  In this round table session, we will share experiences and new ideas to better integrate students to optimize their learning while adding value to the practice site.

      Round Table 7: Cytotoxic Preparation in Developing Countries: Challenges and Way Forward
      Harbans Dhillon, ISOPP President, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

      Cytotoxic preparation in developing countries can be very challenging. Proper facilities, equipment, control of the working environment, use of personal protective equipment, training and education of personnel involved, amongst others, need to be setup to create a safe working environment. Special attention has to be paid towards administration of hazardous drugs, spill and waste management.

      Round Table 8: Strategies for Managing Refractory Nausea and Vomiting

      Alexandre Chan, Deputy Head and tenured Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore

      In this round table discussion, we will focus on effective strategies for managing refractory nausea and vomiting in patients receiving chemotherapy.

      Round Table 9: Chemo Dosing in Special Populations - Obesity and Organ Dysfunction
      Rowena Schwartz, Vice President, Associate Professor of Pharmacy Practice, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA

      The field of clinical oncology is rapidly evolving, and the therapeutic options for treatment of individuals with cancer are growing.  In clinical practice, the use of drug therapy is individualized based on patient specific factors including organ function and weight.  We will discuss strategies for individualization of dosing of anticancer agents in practice.

      Round Table 10: How to Avoid Pitfalls when Submitting Research to the Ethics Committee
      John Wiernikowski, Clinical Pharmacist, Paediatric Haematology/Oncology, McMaster Children’s Hospital, Hamilton, Canada

      If you have a project that will need to be submitted to an Ethics Review Board; come and participate in this round table to get important tips on key elements of your submission that will make the review and approval process as smooth as possible.

      Back to top

      Concurrent Session 4
      Clinical 4: Cancer Associated Thrombosis - Clinical Considerations and Tools for the Oncology Pharmacist

      11:30-12:30

      Marliese Alexander, Pharmacist, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

      Patients with cancer are at high risk of preventable and potentially life-threatening thromboembolic events. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in risk, reflected in the lack of comprehensive guidelines and variability in practice, most notably in the ambulatory care setting. This presentation will cover a broad range of topics from pathophysiology to risk profiling and prevention and treatment strategies. Particular focus will be given to implications of drug choice considering on and off target effects, duration, interactions, monitoring, reversibility, convenience and compliance. Various international approaches will be discussed, with conflicting practices and knowledge gaps highlighted.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Incidence and burden – healthcare utilisation, morbidity, mortality and treatment deliverability;
      2. Pathophysiology;
      3. Longitudinal risk profile;
      4. Cancer-, treatment- and patient-related risk factors;
      5. Risk assessment tools – clinical and biomarker models;
      6. Drug choice – prevention and treatment, on and off target effects, duration, interactions, monitoring, reversibility, convenience and compliance; 
      7. Major guidelines – consistent and conflicting recommendations; and
      8. Evidence gaps.

      Fundamentals 4: The Role of the Pharmacist in the Management of Oral Chemotherapy: From Theory to Practice

      11:30-12:30

      Fabrizio Festinese, Pharmacist, ASST Lodi, Lodi, Italy 

      Communication is an important tool when giving information, especially when it comes to cancer therapies. This session will describe where to start to ensure a good counselling session, how to understand the difficulties that may occur and how to best motivate each patient in the care process.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Understand the sources of information from which to have a good theoretical basis;
      2. Identify the critical phases within the working reality, being able to understand how to improve the process; and
      3. Be able to adapt the information to create an ideal project and study the feasibility.

      Research 4: Collaborating with the Pharmaceutical Industry to Help Reduce the Cost of Cancer Drugs

      11:30-12:30

       

      Carole Chambers, Pharmacy Director, Alberta Health and Services Cancer Care, Calgary, Canada

      Peter Gilbar, Pharmacist Consultant, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia

      Cancer drug expenditure is of growing concern, with pharmaceutical companies criticized for not doing enough to contain drug pricing. The pharmaceutical industry, in collaboration with oncology pharmacists, has the ability to introduce a number of simple inexpensive strategies that have the potential to give better value for little financial outlay. This can make a substantive difference to how drugs are used in the clinical setting, contribute to patient and staff safety, and avoid unnecessary wastage. Several strategies, involving parenteral administration of cancer drugs, have been identified and include: increasing the available range of drug vial strengths, ensuring vials contain sufficient overage, providing reliable extended stability data for products prepared for administration, and providing products in the most suitable form for administration.

      To further elucidate the problem, we identified drugs (65) which may be amenable to these strategies. Cytotoxic agents (29), MABs with cancer indications (16) and MABs without cancer indications (20) were evaluated. Twenty countries were selected to provide a global perspective, with Europe (6), Asia (6), North (2) and South America (2), Africa (2), and Australasia (2) represented. Information was obtained, by ISOPP members, only from the approved Product Information (PI) of individual drugs available in their country. Data was collected on a range of vial sizes available, overage/underage provided in vials, stability data on final product prepared for administration to the patient, and availability in a pre-filled, ready-to-administer syringe for suitable products.

      Drugs were not available in all countries. Limited vial size availability meant many drugs were subject to wastage on preparation or increases in manufacturing time. Short stability allowed wastage as products could not be reused if patients treatments were cancelled or delayed. Overage data was lacking. Pre-filled syringes were available in 10 non-cancer monoclonal antibodies (MABs) but in none of the three suitable cancer MABs.

      Many drugs were identified that are amenable to the above strategies. Oncology pharmacists should work with government agencies and the pharmaceutical industry to implement these measures.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Recognize the reasons behind the increasing expenditure associated with cancer care, particularly in relation to cancer drugs;
      2. Understand the inexpensive strategies that can potentially be used to avoid wastage and give better value for money spent on cancer drugs;
      3. Identify which antineoplastic agents and monoclonal antibodies in which these strategies are suitable for implementing based on the research conducted; and
      4. Appreciate how oncology pharmacists can work with the pharmaceutical industry to help introduce these strategies.

      Back to top

      Concurrent Session 5
      Clinical 5: Hematology Updates

      14:00-15:30

       

      Novel Targets and Combinations for Myeloma Therapy
      Donald Harvey, Associate Professor, Director, Phase 1 Clinical Trails Section, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

      Innovations in molecular biology, pharmacology and formulations have led to a number of new agents approved for the treatment of myeloma across various populations. Improvement in patient outcomes in the relapsed/refractory, as well as initial induction treatment settings have been shown recently. Pharmacists need to be aware of appropriate patient selection, treatment sequencing, and adverse event prevention and management with these novel regimens. This presentation will summarize data relevant to single agent and combination monoclonal antibody therapy, multiple drug induction regimens, and emerging pathways and promising combinations for myeloma patients.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Distinguish between the indicated uses, mechanisms of action, depth and duration of clinical responses, and safety of current and emerging immunotherapeutic targeted agents;
      2. Outline a treatment plan for newly diagnosed patients to achieve the deepest and most durable response while balancing the risk for adverse events; and
      3. Outline a treatment plan for patients who have relapsed from, or are refractory to, their treatment.

      What's New in MDS?
      Tara Leslie, Clinical Pharmacist, Alberta Health Services / University of Alberta, Calgary, Canada

      Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of myeloid clonal disorders characterized by various peripheral blood cytopenias. Patients are vulnerable to morbidities associated with these cytopenias and are also at risk of their disease evolving to an acute myeloid leukemia. MDS is more common in elderly patients and advanced age can limit treatment options. In this session, we will discuss new pharmacotherapy evidence in MDS and supportive care.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Provide a brief update of the new WHO Diagnostic Criteria and Revised IPSS;
      2. Explore the evolving role of lenalidomide for lower risk MDS patients; and
      3. Discuss supportive care issues (such as iron overload and thrombocytopenia) and associated pharmacotherapy.

      Fundamentals 5: Basics of Best Practice

      14:00-15:30

      Best Practices of Oral Chemotherapy and Public Health / Advocacy
      Lisa Holle, Associate Clinical Professor, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA

      This session is aimed at providing examples of best practices related to managing patients receiving oral chemotherapy, advocating for patients and professions at the government level, and incorporating policies into practice when new regulations and laws arise (e.g. use of medical marijuana).

      Learning Objectives

      1. Describe successful efficacy monitoring methods for patients receiving oral chemotherapy;
      2. Discuss appropriate handling and disposal of oral chemotherapy;
      3. Identify opportunities to advocate on behalf of patients with cancer; and
      4. Illustrate approaches to practice policy development with new laws and regulations.

      From Prescription to Administration: How to Handle Hazardous Drugs
      Birgit Tans, Pharmacist, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

      The lecture will give an overview of best practices in handling hazardous drugs according to the current guidelines.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Explain the need for a correct prescription;
      2. Describe the guidelines for safe manipulation of hazardous drugs: preparation, packaging and transport, and administration; and
      3. Discuss how to avoid and manage contamination.

      Research 5: Platform Presentations

      14:00-15:30

      Towards the Safe Handling of Cytotoxic Drugs in Academic Research Settings; Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Working Group
      Racha Sabbagh Dit Hawasli, London, United Kingdom

      Oral Anticancer Drugs: to Crush or Not to Crush 
      Tine Van Nieuwenhuyse and Brigit Tans, Leuven, Belgium 

      Differences Between Online Survey and Mailed Survey from the Nationwide Survey for Community Pharmacists in Japan
      Shinya Suzuki, Kashiwa, Japan

      Developing a Decision Support Tool to Assist Clinicians to Assess the Benefit of Palliative Chemotherapy in Stage 4 Breast Cancer Patients 
      Phebe Si, Singapore, Singapore 

      Challenge the Compatibility of Closed System Transfer Devices with Multiple Chemotherapy Drugs 
      Chenchia Lin, Taipei City, Taiwan

      Efficacy of Four Cleaning Solutions for the Decontamination of Cytotoxic Drugs on Different Surfaces of the Automated Compounding System APOTECAchemo 
      Matteo Federici, Mainz, Germany

       

      Poster and Exhibit Viewing Session

      15:30-17:30

      During the Poster and Exhibit Viewing Session, poster presenters will present their electronic posters (e-posters) in a casual atmosphere.  Participants also have the opportunity to visit the exhibit booths. 

      View the poster presentation schedule.  

      Back to top

      Saturday, April 29

      Plenary
      Platform Presentations

      09:45-10:45

      Oncology Dose-Rounding Program
      Lisa Holle, Storrs, USA 

      Implementation of Camera Technology to Meet Traceability Standards for Compounded Sterile Products and Increase Efficiency in a Regional Cancer Centre 
      Lauren Charbonneau, Toronto, Canada

      Patient Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications in an Asian Tertiary Cancer Care Centre
      Eskinder Eshetu Ali, Singapore, Singapore
      Lita Chew, Singapore, Singapore

      Characteristics and Management of High Incidence of Grade 3, 4 Hypertension in Lenvatinib Oral Chemotherapy for Thyroid Cancer Patients
      Shinya Suzuki, Kashiwa, Japan

       

      Concurrent Session 6
      Clinical 6: Supportive Care Update: Pain Management

      11:30-12:30

      Dezső Embey Isztin, Consultant Anaesthetist, Head of Pain Clinic, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary

      This session covers the types (nociceptive, neuropathic and visceral) and neuroanatomy of pain (lateral spinothalamic, spinoreticularis, spinoreticulothalamic, spino-hypothalamic, spino-mesencephalic and descending inhibitory pathways), the causes of chronic pain, neuropathic pain, principles of pain management, pain treatment methods (drugs, non-invasive techniques, nerve blocks, neuromodulation and neurosurgical interventions), scheduling and titration. A critical assessment of the WHO analgesic ladder is also discussed.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Define the various types of pain associated with cancer, review and understand the clinicopathological background of each;
      2. Distinguish between the pain treatment methods, medications, sites of application and mechanism of action and identify the need of adjuvant analgesics; and
      3. Understand the reasons why the WHO analgesic ladder might not be valid and outline a treatment plan for a cancer patient with pain.

      Fundamentals 6: Appraisal and Funding of Cancer Drugs in England

      11:30-12:30

      David Thomson, Lead Chemotherapy Pharmacist, Chemotherapy CRG and National Cancer Drugs Fund, NHS England, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

      In a time of significant financial pressure on the NHS in England, a number of changes are being made that will increase the importance of affordability in the appraisal and funding of cancer drugs. The session will discuss the history of the appraisal and funding of cancer drugs in England and an overview of the current processes and proposed changes. Particular focus will be given to the cancer drugs fund and proposals for the setting of budget impact limits for cancer drugs. The session will also review work being led by cancer pharmacists in England to assist with the affordability problem such as the implementation of chemotherapy treatment algorithms and the introduction of biosimilars/generics. 

      Learning Objectives
      1.      Overview of the appraisal and funding of cancer drugs in England;
      2.      Understand the mechanisms being put in place to limit the growth in expenditure of cancer drugs; and
      3.      Discuss the lessons for and from other countries.

      Research 6: Side Effect Management on Immune-Oncology Agents

      11:30-12:30

      Bruce Burnett, Senior Lecturer in Pharmacy Practice, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom

      This session will cover the immune related toxicities of cancer therapy, with a focus on the newer checkpoint inhibitors, and its management. There will be consideration of both common and rarer side effects as well as considering their impact when combined with existing therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Describe the common toxicity profile associated with immunotherapy and their management;
      2. Identify "at risk patients" and consider strategies to manage these patients; and 
      3. Discuss the potential problems associated with combining these immunotherapies with other treatments.

      Back to top

      Concurrent Session 7
      Clinical 7: BMT Updates

      14:00-15:30

      Role of the Pharmacist in the FACT-JACIE Process
      Tiene Bauters, Clinical Pharmacist, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

      The major objective of the FACT-JACIE International Standards for Hematopoietic Cellular Therapy Product Collection, Processing, and Administration (the "Standards”) is to promote quality practice in hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation and other therapies using cellular products.

      Since the 6th Edition, new requirements were added for pharmacists who are involved in the care of hematopoietic stem cell patients.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Overview of the new requirements for pharmacists since the 6th Edition of the FACT-JACIE Standards; and
      2. Practical overview on how pharmacists can comply with the Standards.

      Hiking the Haplo Path with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide
      Jennifer Jupp, Pharmacy Clinical Practice Leader, Inpatient Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant, Alberta Health Service - Calgary Zone, Calgary, Canada

      When a patient doesn’t have a matched related/unrelated donor….an overview of alternative donors will take place at this session.  As #haplos are trending, we will also discuss the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide as part of the GVHD prophylaxis platform in haploidentical BMT patients.  

      Learning Objectives

      1. Provide an overview of alternative donor sources for patients without a matched donor;
      2. Discuss the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide in the setting of haploidentical transplant; and
      3. Summarize the differences between umbilical cord blood, haploidentical and matched related donor transplants. 

      Fundamentals 7: Stability of Cancer Agents

      14:00-15:30

      Alain Astier, Head of the Department of Pharmacy, Henri Mondor University Hospital Group, Paris, France

      The objective of this session, is to explain the main physico-chemical principles of the degradation of anticancer drugs. Alain will focus not only on the chemical instability of classical anticancer drugs but on the physical instability of complex formulations and therapeutic proteins. Including a special discussion on the stability of diluted bags of monoclonal antibodies sent by pneumatic network system.

      What In-use Stability Data do Hospital Pharmacist Practically Need?
      Johan Vandenbrouke, Senior Pharmacist Production, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

      There are different kinds of stability, all with their own specificity and challenges. In this presentation, an overview will be given of the different types of stability along with a discussion what is already existent and what could be helpful and needed by the hospital pharmacist in his/her daily practice.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Understand what stability means;
      2. Know what to look for in stability studies; and
      3. Discuss what we need in the (near) future.

      Research 7: Research into Oral Chemotherapy Management Programs

      14:00-15:30

      The Italian Point of View about the Oral Chemotherapy Management Programs
      Fabrizio Festinese, Pharmacist, ASST Lodi, Lodi, Italy

      This session will explore the literature in Italy around oral chemotherapy management programs and will describe the strategies adopted by the Italian Scientific Societies and the solutions implemented by government institutions.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Analyze of the recent Italian literature and description of the results on the subject of oral chemotherapy management programs;
      2. Understand the actions put in place by government institutions according to the Italian Scientific Societies; and
      3. Understand which strategies to adopt in the future to improve the management of oral chemotherapy.

      Chemotherapy Management Program Research: A Review of the Literature
      Lisa Holle, Associate Clinical Professor, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA

      This session will provide an overview of the literature related to the research of oral chemotherapy management programs, including methodology and results. Implications and incorporation of this research into daily practice will be discussed.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Review the types of research conducted with oral chemotherapy management programs;
      2. Describe the outcomes of oral chemotherapy management program research; and
      3. Identify appropriate methodology for future rigorous assessment of oral chemotherapy management programs.

      Ensuring the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Chemotherapies in a Society that Encourages Separate Dispensing and Prescribing Functions: Strategies and Experience in Japan
      Shinya Suzuki, Pharmacist, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

      Within the development of molecular anticancer agents that are primarily utilized in outpatient settings, management of outpatient chemotherapy, especially oral chemotherapy, has become one of the most discussed topics in the Japanese medical community. Under the Japanese government policy, which promotes the separation of dispensing and prescribing functions, community pharmacies dispense prescriptions and counsel patients about most oral chemotherapies. However, the knowledge and skills of community pharmacists are insufficient to ensure the safe management of oral chemotherapy; therefore, cancer care hospitals have difficulties managing outpatient oral chemotherapies.

      Our studies show that while hospital pharmacists manage outpatient injection chemotherapy prescriptions well (Suzuki S, JOPP, 2015), they lack interventions for oral chemotherapies (Suzuki S, Int J Clin Pharm, 2016). Abbott likewise reported a lack of oral chemotherapy knowledge among community pharmacists, and suggested that adequate education was needed to ensure the safety and effectiveness of oral chemotherapy in outpatient settings (Abbott R, JOPP, 2013). We performed a nationwide survey using the same questionnaire previously conducted by Abbot in Canada. In Japan, we also found that community pharmacists similarly do not possess the required education to manage oral chemotherapy. Further, we showed that there is a statistical correlation between the amount of continuous education and confidence of community pharmacists on oral chemotherapy (Suzuki S, Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2017).

      The Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Oncology (JASPO) has recently collaborated with community pharmacists to provide educational programs on oral chemotherapy. In March 2016, JASPO published guidance on outpatient chemotherapy management aimed at both hospital and community pharmacists, and has used these guidelines in educational programs on oral chemotherapy. In addition, research projects have been initiated to ensure the safety of oral chemotherapy, including one at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Moreover, the Japanese government has included coverage of pharmacist interventions in outpatient divisions as a reimbursable service under the national health insurance system, and remote intervention via telephone is also currently under consideration for reimbursement. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has moved to advance medical systems in community medicine, including the development of a certification system for advanced functions in community pharmacy.

      During this session, Shinya will share ideas about how to manage outpatient oral chemotherapy, which is a difficult task for cancer care hospitals that conduct chemotherapy.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Recognize and share the barriers to oral chemotherapy in outpatient settings;
      2. Identify important tactics and strategies for successful outpatient oral chemotherapy in daily practice; and
      3. Share ideas and knowledge on information required by ISOPP.

      Back to top

      Closing Panel: Dollars and Sense

      15:30-16:30

      Barbara Claus, Pharmacist, Ghent, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
      Harbans Dhillon, ISOPP President, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
      Shaun O'Connor, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
      Rowena Schwartz, Vice President, Associate Professor of Pharmacy Practice, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA
      Shinya Suzuki, Pharmacist, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
      David Thomson, Chemotherapy Pharmacist,Chemotherapy CRG and National Cancer Drugs Fund, NHS England, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

      Moderator: Carole Chambers, Pharmacy Director, Alberta Health and Services Cancer Care, Calgary, Canada

      Although most of us would like to ignore the financial implications in cancer drug therapy, the astronomical continued rise in total expenditures is demanding review. This session will discuss the international perspectives on three recent publications and consultations.

      Learning Objectives

      1. Name three of the various financial tools that are used when new drugs are considered for listing;
      2. Appreciate the differences between cost effectiveness and financial sustainability; and
      3. Share and understand the perspectives and strategies from various countries regarding this shared challenge.

      Poster and JOPP Awards and Closing Remarks

      16:30-17:00

      Harbans Dhillon, ISOPP President, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 

      Back to top